Project Documentation References

REFERENCES CITED

Bettinger, E. P. and Long, B. T. 2005. Do Faculty Serve as Role Models? The Impact of Instructor Gender on Female Students. AEA Proceedings, 95:152-157.
(American Economic Association)

Bielby, W. T. 2000. Minimizing Workplace Gender and Racial Bias. Contemporary Sociology, 29(1):120-129.

Blake-Beard, S. D. 2001. Taking a Hard Look at Formal Mentoring Programs: A Consideration of Potential Challenges Facing Women. Journal of Management Development, 20(4):331-345.

Bollinger, L. C. 2007. Why Diversity Matters. Chronicle of Higher Education, 53(39):B20.

Brass, D. J., Galaskiewicz, J., Greve, H. R., andW. Tsai. 2004. Taking Stock of Networks and Organizations: A Multilevel Perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6):795817.

Britton, Dana. 2000. The Epistemology of the Gendered Organization. Gender & Society, 14:418-434.

Bystydzienski, J. M. and Bird, S. R. 2006. Removing Barriers: Women in Academic Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Indiana University Press, Bloomington.

Chubin, D. E., May, G. S., and Babco, E. L. 2005. Diversifying the engineering workforce. Jour. Engineering Education, 94:7386.
(BNET Business Network)

Cole, J., and Zuckerman, H. 1984. The Productivity Puzzle: Persistence and Change in Patterns of Publication of Men and Women Scientists. In Advances in Motivation and Achievement. Eds. M. Maehr and M. Steinkamp. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, 217258.

Committee on Maximizing the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering. 2006. Beyond Bias and Barriers: Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering. National Academies Press, Washington, DC.

Cummings, J. N. and Cross, R. 2003. Structural Properties of Work Groups and their Consequences for Performance.Social Networks, 25:197-210.

Drago, R., Colbeck, C. L., Stauffer, K. D., Pirretti, A., Burkum, K., Fazioli J., Lazzaro, G. and Habasevich, T. 2006. The Avoidance of Bias against Caregiving: The Case of Academic Faculty. American Behavioral Scientist, 49:1222-1247. DOI: 10.1177/0002764206286387.
(Academe Online)

Etzkowitz, H., Kemelgor, C., Neuschatz, M., Uzzi, B., and Alonzo, J. 1994. The Paradox of Critical Mass for Women in Science. Science, 266:51-54. (7 October 1994)

Fox, M. F. 2001. Women, Science, and Academia: Graduate Education and Careers. Gender & Society 15:654-666.

Fox, M. F., 1996. Women, Academia, and Careers in Science and Engineering. In Davis, C.S., Ginorio, A., Hollenshead, C., Lazarus, B. and P. Rayman (eds.), The Equity Equation: Fostering the Advancement of Women in the Sciences, Mathematics, and Engineering. JosseyBass, San Francisco.

Friedkin, N.E. 2004. Social Cohesion. Annual Review of Sociology, 30:409-425.
(Department of Sociology, University of California, Santa Barbara)

Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., and Schwartz, J. L. K., 1998. Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74:1464-1480.
(University of Washington)

Handelsman, J., Cantor, N., Carnes, M., Denton, D., Fine, E., Grosz, B., Hinshaw, V., Marrett, C., Rosser, S., Shalala, D., and Sheridan, J. 2005. MoreWomen in Science. Science, 309:1190-1191.
(University of Wisconson - Madison)

Hornig, L. S. 2003. Equal Rites, Unequal Outcomes: Women in American Research Universities. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers: New York.

Ibarra H., 1993, Personal Networks of Women and Minorities in Management: A Conceptual Framework, The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 18, No. 1. (Jan., 1993), pp. 5687.

Kalev, Alexandra, Frank Dobbin, and Erin Kelly. 2006. Best practices or best guesses? Diversity management and the remediation of inequality. American Sociological Review, 71: 589-617.
(Harvard University)

Kilduff, M., Tsai, B., and Hanke, R. 2006. A Paradigm too Far? A Dynamic Stability Reconsideration of the Social Network Research Program. Academy of Management Review, 31:10311048.
(Penn State)

Kirby, E. L., and Krone, K. J. 2002. The Policy Exists but you Can't Really Use It: Communication and the Structuration of Work Family Policies. Jour. Applied Communication Research, 30(1):5077.

Ledin, A., Bornmann, L., Gannon, F., and Wallon, G. 2007. A Persistent Problem: Traditional Gender Roles Hold Back Female Scientists. European Molecular Biology Organization reports, 8(11):982-987.

Martinez, E. D., Botos, J., Dohoney, K.M., Geiman, T. M., Kolla, S. S., Olivera, A., Qiu, Y., Fayasam, G. V., Stavreva, D., and CohenFix, O. 2007. Falling off the Academic Bandwagon. European Molecular Biology Organization reports, 8(11):977-981.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2002. A Study on the Status of Women Faculty in Science at MIT.
(MIT - pdf)

McGuire, F. M. 2000. Gender, Race, Ethnicity, and Networks: The Factors Affecting the Status of Employees' Network Members. Work and Occupations, 27: 501-523.

Mederer, H., Sherwood, J., and Silver, B. 2007. Is a Caring Workplace Possible? Targets for Organizational Change. Submitted to Gender and Society (shared by authors).

Moody, J. 2004. Faculty Diversity, Problems and Solutions. Routledge, New York.

Mukasa, S. B. and STRIDE Committee. 2004. The NSF-Supported ADVANCE Initiative at the University of Michigan Aimed at Successful Recruitment and Retention of Women Faculty in Science and Engineering. Eos Trans. American Geophysical Union, vol. 85(47), Fall Meet. Suppl., Abstract ED23B0098.
(AGU)

Nelson, D. 2007. A National Analysis of Minorities in Science and Engineering Faculties at Research Universities.
(University of Oklahoma)

Nosek, B. A., Greenwald, A. G., and Banaji, M. R. 2007. The Implicit Association Test at Age 7: A Methodological and Conceptual Review (pp. 265-292). In Bargh, J. A. (ed.), Automatic processes in social thinking and behavior. Psychology Press.
(University of Washington)

O'Connell, S., and Holmes, M. A. 2007. Retreating to AdvanceWomen Geoscience Faculty. Eos Trans. American Geophysical Union, 88(47).

Pescosolido, B.A. and Rubin, B.A. 2000. TheWeb of Group Affiliations Revisited: Social Life, Postmodernism, and Sociology. American Sociological Review, 65:52-76.

Plant, E. A. and Devine, P. G. 2003. The Antecedents and Implications of Interracial Anxiety. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29:790-801.

Reagans, R. and Zuckerman, E. W. 2001. Networks, Diversity and Productivity: the Social Capital of Corporate R & D Teams. Organization Science, 12(4):502-517.

Realff, M. L., Colatrella, C., and Fox, M. F. 2007. InterConnected Networks for Advancement in Academic Science and Engineering: Theory, Practices, and Implementation. In Transforming Science and Engineering: Advancing Academic Women. Eds. A. Stewart, J. Malley, and D. LaVaqueManty. The University of Michigan Press. Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Reskin, B. 2003. Motives and Mechanisms in Modeling Inequality. American Sociological Review, 68:1-21.
[ASA members only]

Ridgeway, C. L. and Correll, S. J. 2004. Unpacking the Gender System: A Theoretical Perspective on Gender Beliefs and Social Relations. Gender & Society, 18(4):510-531.
(University of Washington, Department of Sociology)

Ridgeway, C. L. 1997. Interaction and the Conservation of Gender Inequality: Considering Employment. American Sociological Review, 62:21835.

Risman, B. J. 2004. Gender as a Social Structure: Theory Wrestling with Activism. Gender & Society, 18(4):429-450. DOI: 10.1177/0891243204265349.

Rosser, S. V., 2004. The Science Glass Ceiling: Academic Women Scientists and the Struggle to Succeed. Routledge, New York.
(ETS.org)

Snyder, D. K. (I 979). Multidimensional assessment of marital satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 813-823.
STRIDE (ADVANCE at the University of Michigan)

Turner, C. S. V. and Myers, S. L. 2000 Faculty of Color in Academe: Bittersweet Success. Allyn and Bacon, Boston.

Valian, V. 1999. Why So Slow? The Advancement of Women. MIT Press, Boston.

Wasserman, S. and Faust, K. 1994. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press, New York.

Wellman, B. 1988. Structural Analysis: From Method and Metaphor to Theory and Substance. In Social Structures: A Network Approach. Eds. B.Wellman and S. D. Berkowitz. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

West, C. and Zimmerman, D. H., 1987. Doing Gender. Gender & Society, 1:125-151.

Williams, J. 2000. Unbending Gender. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Yen, J., Quinn, K., Carrigan, C., Litzler, E., and Riskin, E. A., 2007. The ADVANCE Mentoring for Leadership Lunch Series for Women Faculty in STEM at the University of Washington. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 13:191-206.

Xie, Y., and Shauman, K. A. 2003. Women in science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Xie, Y. and Shauman, K.A. 1996. Sex Differences in Research Productivity: New Evidence about an Old Puzzle. American Sociological Review, 63(6):847-870.